Governing Equations
Model Sensitivity & Site Location
Ripple Geometry and Bottom Roughness
Results of Long-term Studies
Calibration of gamma
Shown below is the transformation technique applied to the
concentration and current equations to determine u*c
and the Rouse parameter a1. Also shown is a
representative concentration and current profile.
Once a1 and b1 are calculated from the
profile data, linear statistics are used to produce the
regression coefficient (R) to determine the quality of the
the best fit.
To determine a cutoff for R, we use the Z = atanh(R) statistic
adopted by Gross et al. (1992). This provides an
objective cutoff since Z has a normal distribution barring
any process (bio-fouling, low flow) that may alter the current
profile from the logarithmic variation with height expected
in the constant stress layer. The Z statistic for the 1995 data
is shown below for the full data set (left) and for data up to
year day 250 (right), when bio-fouling was suspected to
begin to significantly compromise data quality.
Inverting the mean of Z set the minimum R2 for the
current and concentration at 0.94 and 0.87, respectively.
Using only bursts that were greater than the cutoff, produced
an average gamma of 0.41. This is lower than the widely
reported value 0.74, and suggests that gamma may be grain
size dependent with larger grains producing smaller gamma.
Similar claims have been made in the past (Villaret and
Trowbridge 1991; Hill et al. 1988).
Questions???
styles@arctic.rutgers.edu