Feb 19: Tides and tidal
currents (4)
|
Wave equation with linear
friction on
:

Assume solution where the
wave amplitude decays as the wave propagates:
![]()
Differentiating h and substituting into the damped wave
equation and independently satisfying the real and imaginary parts of the
equation we obtain:
showing how the
wave speed is reduced, and
assuming c/co ~ 1 (weak
friction).
The corresponding velocity
follows from continuity

upon assuming a solution of
the form
![]()
This incorporates the
possibility of a phase shift with respect to the sea level displacement. We
obtain:

Notice that the current:
·
is no longer in phase with the amplitude
o the current
peaks a time a/w before the sea level crest
·
the magnitude is reduced compared to the same
frictionless wave
The key parameter is m/ k: the ratio of the
wavelength (k-1) to the damping length scale (m-1)
In a study of Mid-Atlantic
Bight tides, Redfield (1950) found that in order to obtain satisfactory
agreement with observations the product mL, where L is the
wavelength, needed to be about 0.5. (He estimated values of 1 for the Bay of
Fundy and 1.5 to 2 for the
[ loss of amplitude is e-mL =
e-0.5 = 0.6]
The phase shift of the velocity is then

Tides generated in the deep
ocean due to the TGF propagate as waves toward the coast.
The decreasing depth alters
their dynamics.
An order of magnitude
estimate of the change in wave height can be calculated by considering
conservation of wave energy.
Energy flux in a shallow
water wave:
Power = Work/time =
Force*distance/time = Force*velocity
For a wave train
·
Force is pressure * Area
·
so wave energy flux (or power of the incoming wave
field) is:
·
energy flux in
Dy width of wave crest and over depth Dz (the area) is
o Eflux = ![]()
The pressure perturbation
and density do not alter with depth (homogeneous fluid and hydrostatic pressure
balance), so integrate over depth dz and divide by width to get Eflux per unit width wave crest
Energy flux /
= ![]()
Averaging over one period
(or wave length) the cos2 term is ½
Energy
flux /
Eflux = 
=
energy density * group velocity (
)
[
I will say more about group
velocity – speed at which energy propagates through a
medium – at the end of the lecture. ]
Consider a wave traveling
from ocean of depth h1 into shallow water on the
water of depth h2.
Energy conservation demands
that

For, e.g., h1 = 4000 m and h2
= 100 m, the amplitude of the tidal wave increases by a factor of
A2/A1
= (4000/100)1/4 = 2.51
A deep ocean tidal amplitude
of, say, 0.35 meters will increase to 0.88 meters.
This is close to the
observed amplification of the M2 tide in the South Atlantic Bight
(see Bowden fig 2.9)
The M2 tide
approaches the US Atlantic coast almost at right angles, with the phase varying
little from Cape Cod to the
(We can update Bowden’s
figure with results from the ADCIRC numerical tidal model – R. Luettich http://adcirc.org/)
[M2
tide amplitude and phase from ADCIRC model (AtlanticBightM2.pdf)]
M2 and S2
tidal elevation in the northeast


Velocity:

For the depth ratio 4000/100 this is a factor of 16.
Velocities are amplified considerably more than sea levels.
A deep ocean tidal velocity of, say, 2.5 cm/s will
increase to 40 cm/s.
In reality
·
there will be some frictional loss of energy
·
some energy will be reflected back to the deep ocean
·
changes occurring on a sloping bottom need to be
accounted for
o here we
balanced energy in two locations of uniform depth without considering how the
waves alter through the depth transition
Energy input is in the deep sea, and the coastal
response is to this incoming energy is locally amplified.
Direct input of momentum from the TGF in coastal waters
is generally not significant.
In models, coastal tidal response is frequently
treated by assuming the tides are remotely forced at the deep ocean edge by
imposing the amplitude and phase of the sea level and velocity variability,
i.e. and ignoring the influence of the TGF within the costal region.
Solving the governing equations in coastal waters,
subject to these perimeter open boundary conditions, generally does a good job
of simulating the coastal tide.
The majority of energy coming onto the shelf is
dissipated in the shelf seas which form the major sink of tidal energy. The
stresses exert a braking effect on the earth’s rotation, and estimates of the
net effect of tidal friction can be deduced from the acceleration of the moon
in its orbit which is required to conserve angular momentum as the earth slows
down (and the length of day increases very slightly).
Dissipation is estimated at around 3.4 TeraWatts.
About 1.7 TW of this is thought to be due to the barotropic (depth-average)
tide, with speculation presently that the remainder is dissipated in a few
isolated locations by the baroclinic tide.
The class of waves we have considered here, shallow
water gravity waves, have the property that they are non-dispersive, which
denotes that their speed is independent of wavelength. Consequently, a packet
of waves made up of different wavelengths/wave-numbers (in a Fourier
decomposition sense) would not disperse into separate wavelengths
traveling at different speeds.
This is not generally true of waves in fluids.
The general case is that wave speed is a function of
wave-number, which has significant implications for the speed of propagation of
energy.
Consider the general superposition of two plane waves
of the same amplitude but with slightly different wave-numbers and frequencies:

This can be interpreted as an
approximately sinusoidal wave with phase f = kx – wt but with amplitude:

Individual crests of the
modulated wave packet travel at speed c = w/k but the
envelope of the packet travels at the group velocity:
In general the wave-number k
is actually a vector, k = (kx,
Narrow gulf, and ignore friction

x = 0 at the
closed end, x = L at the open end
We want to consider the case of the sea level
variability at the entrance to the gulf of amplitude ![]()
Accordingly, we denote the variation at x=L as
![]()
(
There can be no velocity at the closed end (x=0),
so the general solution is a standing wave of the form
![]()
which will satisfy the governing equations, where k
is the wave-number and
is the angular frequency, and U is an as yet unspecified current magnitude.
Substituting this solution for
into (1), it follows
that

Then integrate w.r.t. x …

This satisfies equation (2) provided
![]()
This shows the length scale of the oscillation within
the bay is set by k, the wave-number of the freely propagating shallow
water wave.
is the angular frequency.
Evaluating this at x=0 shows that the
coefficient A is the amplitude of the sea level variation at the head
of the gulf.
Since the particular solution at the mouth is:
![]()
and the general solution along the whole length of the
gulf is:
![]()
then to be consistent with the imposed forcing at the
mouth, the amplitude of the response in the gulf must be:
![]()
If cos kL = 0
then resonance occurs.

The first resonance occurs for
, the so-called quarter-wave resonator.
The cases
and
are shown in [Bowden fig 2.12]
Question:
Where do the strongest velocities occur in these two
situations?
·
![]()
o
largest
at the head, strongest
U at the mouth
·
o
largest
at the head, strongest
U at ![]()
The wavelength can be replaced by
to enable an easy
calculation of the resonance properties of an idealized gulf of depth h for
a tidal harmonic constituent of given period T.
Resonant length ![]()
In reality, infinite resonance does not occur due to
frictional dissipation and other effects that were neglected in deriving the
simple equations.
The neglect of Coriolis is not a serious defect of the
analysis
– the resonance property stills holds because the
Kelvin wave speed does not alter with f.
Coriolis introduces an across-gulf pattern to the
response because of the Rossby radius decay scale of the incoming and outgoing
waves.
Sea level is high on the right on flood tide, and low
on ebb tide (as Kelvin wave flows back out)
The amplitude of the transverse oscillation depends on
the width of the gulf compared to the Rossby radius.
For
without Coriolis
across entire width
of gulf
For
with Coriolis
only in mid-point of
gulf
This is an amphidromic point.
Amphidromic points will occur at all the nodes of the
resonance pattern where the phase of an incoming Kelvin wave cancels the phase
of the out-going wave (possibly more that one tidal period prior)
Bowden gives a simple solution (equation 2.66) for the
in-going plus out-going Kelvin waves, ignoring the details of the boundary
condition u=0 at the head of the gulf:
![]()
At high tide,
from which we can compute
the shape of the co-phase lines along which high tide occurs at the same
time.
Perpendicular to the co-phase lines are the co-range
lines
In developing a resonance theory for a wider gulf in
which the influence of the Coriolis cannot be neglected, the transverse
component of velocity v must be included when considering the reflection
process at the head of the gulf.
This introduces the other momentum equation and
complicates the analysis. (Bowden presents
Near the mouth of the gulf, the solution resembles two
Kelvin waves with no appreciable cross-channel velocity.
At some along channel locations, the two Kelvin waves
cancel out producing an amphidromic point in mid-channel (high tide occurs on
one side while low tide occurs on the other).
At other locations, high occurs simultaneously on both
sides, and the sea level oscillates up and down in concert.
Near the head of the gulf, to meet the boundary
condition of no flow normal to the coast, other Kelvin wave-like modes are
generated and the currents rotate in direction (rather than oscillating to and
fro parallel to the coast).
Frictional effects
Friction will act to damp the amplitude of the
out-going Kelvin wave so that reflection is only partial.
This causes the point of cancellation to move toward
the coast that is to the left looking into the gulf (in the northern
hemisphere).
If the frictional dissipation is large enough, the
amplitude of the reflected wave will be less than the sea level displacement
due to the incoming wave and the amphidrome point will vanish.
The magnitude of the frictional dissipation that
causes this will depend on the ratio of
Rossby radius to channel width.
These processes explain many of the features we
observe in co-tidal diagrams for marginal seas, such as the Yellow Sea M2
and K1 co-tidal charts given in Simpson (fig 5.2)