Coastal
Geology I and II
Coastal
Geology I: Coasts and Beaches
September
30th
Karl F. Nordstrom
Read and know Sverdrup
(2004) Chapter 12, pp. 300-320; review your notes on waves.
Coastal
characteristics
Large temporal and spatial scale (due to
tectonics, geologic structure and climate change)
Primary (non-coastal
origin) and secondary coasts
Evolution over long
term (hundreds to thousands of years)
Coastal types:
tectonic, fjord, moraine, drowned valley (ria), delta, barrier island, barred
(with spits), reef,
mangrove and salt marsh
Beaches and dunes are critical elements at smaller
temporal and spatial scale
Sources and sinks for beach materials
Affect sediment
budgets, locations of erosion/deposition and characteristics of beach materials
Sources: eroding
headlands and other coastal formations, streams, artificial nourishment
Sinks: submarine
canyons, inlets (not a permanent loss), shore protection structures
Human alterations (dominant in many locations)
Beach
change
Onshore-offshore sediment transport (storm cycles)
Onshore winds
Blow
water onshore and raise water levels (create offshore current at depth)
Increase
wave heights and turbulence
Saturate
upper beach and cause erosion
Create
a flatter, upper beach and a break point bar
Cause
dune erosion and overwash
Offshore winds
Blow
water offshore and lower water levels (create onshore current at depth)
Decrease
wave heights and turbulence (water percolates into beach and deposition occurs)
Post-storm
wave action replaces beach but not dune
Dynamic equilibrium (great short-term mobility but
a return to pre-disturbance conditions)
Pre-disturbance conditions not achieved where
sediment or space restricted
Longshore transport is a major cause of sediment
loss
Waves break at
angles, causing longshore flow
Sediment in
suspension in turbulent surf and swash moves alongshore (downdrift)
Landforms migrate onshore and alongshore in
response to sediment budgets and sea level rise
Sediment transported
to spits and into inlets
Overwash converts
bay bottoms to marsh; marsh to upland
Many natural
features can be re-established farther inland if space is available
Coastal construction
(buildings and infrastructure)
Structures prevent landforms from migrating
landward
Buildings often built too close to water
Beach erosion is followed by subsequent damage to
landward structures by waves
Destruction/reconstruction cycles (structures
rebuilt Òbigger and betterÓ)
Shore protection
strategies
Shore-perpendicular structures
Groins (on beach)
Trap
sand but do not prevent the mechanism for longshore transport
Accretion
occurs updrift and erosion occurs downdrift
Diversion
of some sediment offshore to form bars
New
groins rebuilt to allow some sand to pass (e.g. notched groins in NJ)
Jetties (at inlets)
Prevent
deposition in navigation channel (accretion updrift and erosion downdrift)
Confine
tidal flows, scouring channel
Shore-parallel walls
Bulkheads (backup
protection to beach; hold upland in place)
Seawalls (large,
freestanding structures that provide protection against direct wave attack)
Revetments (diminish
wave energy through runup)
Bigger/better
structures must be built as erosion of beach continues
Breakwaters (costly; sand starvation downdrift
still a problem)
Now is the principal
choice for shore protection
Increases long-term
management options
Sand usually brought
to beach from offshore by pipeline or from land source by truck and reshaped
Requires long-term
periodic commitment
Borrow sources may
be finite
Sand backpassing
Lonshore recycling
of sediment
Way of overcoming
diminishing sources for nourishment projects
Sand bypassing
Usually at inlets
but rare
Dunes (natural feature treated here as human
artifact because of widespread modification)
Battleground for
land use wars because of location between beach and development
Grading (bulldozing)
Easily accomplished
Usually a post-storm
response
Creates a landform
with different internal characteristics and growing conditions
Land use controls and
construction criteria
Restriction zones (maintain natural protection;
prevent economic loss, protect threatened species)
NJ Coastal Area Facilities Review Act
Restricts
construction and sand removal
Endangered species program
Controls access by
vehicles, pedestrians
Municipal actions critical: zoning regulations,
dune building operations
Compatible designs (reduce loss to buildings)
Required in Federal
Insurance Administration program
Elevate
above flood levels and waves
Make
windproof (rare)
Implications for future
management
Retreat or protect
buildings in place?
Maintain
beaches as artifacts or natural systems?
Coastal Geology II: The New Jersey Shore and Beach Management
October 1st
Delaware Bay shore
Barrier
beach transgressing (moving landward) over marsh in north and eroding upland in
south
Dominant
waves generated locally by winds blowing across the bay
Wave
energies low (relative to ocean)
Short
fetch distance (max 45 km) for wave generation
Wave
height about 0.5 m and period about 4.5 s with strong onshore winds
Narrow
beach (20 m) due to low-energy waves
Low
dune heights (<2.5 m) due to limited source of sand
Erosion
still occurs despite low wave energies
Cape May
Terminal
groins at western end of city
Classic
case of sand starvation downdrift
Erosion
of undeveloped land downdrift not considered a problem in past
Changing
perception of value of eroding natural habitat
Natural
area now protected using beach nourishment (new precedent)
Seawall
along city required because beach eliminated due to jetties at Cape May Inlet
Corps
nourishment project implemented to overcome sand deficit
Flat
beach maintained as recreation platform and raked to eliminate litter (common
in NJ)
Natural
topography and vegetation prevented by raking
The barrier island coast
Barrier
islands form on flat coast as equilibrium (wave created and shaped) feature
Coast
is flat because it is a coastal plain, reworked by waves at higher water levels
in past
Inundation
during Cretaceous period (e.g. where pine barrens are)
Pleistocene
reworking created former barrier island at marsh margin along G.S. Parkway
Barrier
islands separated by inlets that are now major controls on shoreline changes
Cape May Inlet
Good
example of sand starvation downdrift (at Cape May) with accretion updrift
(Wildwood Crest)
Sand
bypass included in design but not implemented due to cost; problem at many
inlets with jetties
Wildwood and Hereford Inlet
Beach
too wide for many tourists - a rare problem
Accretion
caused by sand transported past Hereford Inlet; new shore not built upon
Dune
not desired or allowed to grow because it would interfere with view of sea,
access
Inlet dynamics (Figure 1 in handout)
Natural
changes are cyclic and involve breaches in the ebb tidal delta or updrift
barrier island
Longshore
transport brings sediment to inlet, filling channel
Downdrift
deflection of channel erodes tip of next barrier island downdrift
Ebb
tidal flows deposit sediment at mouth of channel near downdrift shoreline
Ebb
delta protects shoreline downdrift
Result
is accretionary bulge in barrier island downdrift
Changes
in erosion and deposition zones when breaches occur
Ebb
delta breaching
Flooding
through ebb delta during storms creates new channel updrift
New
channel becomes more efficient and captures tidal flow
Previous
channel shoals and sediment is driven onshore to downdrift barrier
New
channel is later deflected downdrift due to net drift, completing cycle
Barrier
breaching
Dramatic
changes to shoreline; more common before intensive human development
Updrift
barrier low and narrow due to rapid accretion (easily breached)
Flow
through breach scours channel that becomes more efficient
Former
(downdrift) channel shoals; sand driven onshore by waves to downdrift island
Channel
deflected downdrift by new longshore transport, returning to initial condition
Breaching
of updrift barrier now prevented in many locations by shore protection
structures
Jetties
and shore protection structures at other inlets have greatly reduced natural
mobility (Figure 2)
Avalon
Example
of how natural values can be retained or restored given appreciation of dunes
Remnant
high dunes provide example of vegetation that once characterized other NJ
barriers
Section
of properties purchased after storm of March 1962
Memory
of storm had not faded; post-storm accretion had not occurred; owners willing
to sell
Beach
in this area not needed for protection; sand used as source to fill other areas
Residents
accept dunes as a viable means of protecting properties
Beaches
and dunes in eroding part of town built up using municipal earth-moving
equipment
Dune
higher than natural dune because it is designed as barrier for hurricane
protection
Surface
un-natural (sediment dumped; composed of coarse material not transported by
wind)
Planted
with single species - American
beach grass (Ammophila breviligulata)
Vegetation
evolves (species diversity, aesthetic appeal and natural function
Examples
of use of geotextiles
Used
in the same way as rock structure but temporary (breakwater at Townsend Inlet)
Used
as resistant membrane within dune (near 8th Street)
Sea Isle City
Narrow
beach, dune insufficient for protection (slated for beach nourishment like most
NJ towns)
Example
of ÒdisposalÓ dune
Groin
field creates seaward bulge in shoreline; slower rate of erosion where shore is
protected
Condominiums
near beach create eddies; alter wind direction and sand transport; scour beach
Increase
wind-blown sand hazard
NJ
CAFRA regulations prevent new high rises near beach, except Atlantic City, Long
Branch
Strathmere
Whale
Beach severely damaged in March 1962 storm
Seaward
row of buildings destroyed
One
of few locations where building line following storm was not the same as
pre-storm line
Maintained
in vulnerable state by short-term projects
Protected
because shorefront road is required for coastal access and as evacuation route
Dune
replaced in trucking operation following each moderate-intensity storm
Corson
Inlet example of sand bypassing inlet through transport on ebb tide delta
Ocean City
Beach
nourishment has created wide beach and opportunity for restoration of natural
values
Beach
replenishes volume of sand but does not necessarily restore natural
environments
Many
residents prefer flat, raked beach and landscape typical of suburbs
Nourished
beach initially managed for one value (recreation)
Only
the beach below the upper limit of normal wave uprush may function naturally
Result
is loss of natural image and environmental heritage
Municipality
built dunes using fences and plantings of American beach grass
Prevention
of trampling and raking to protect piping plovers resulted in incipient dunes
seaward
Dune
has new ecological value and increased value for aesthetics and nature-based tourism
Residents
still want view of sea, making large dune difficult to achieve (lawsuit)
Absecon Island
Margate/Longport
examples of flat raked beach (little value other than as unattractive platform)
Were
approved for nourished beach, but state required dune, and residents refused
Atlantic
City (good example of effects of high rise structures on beach)
Dune
considered compatible despite intensive development (enlightened beach manager)
Dune
partially bulldozed and has geotube buried within it to provide backup erosion
protection
Brigantine
Jetty
updrift of Absecon inlet created wide beach/dune
Natural
features survive because new construction not allowed in accreting area
North
end of island undeveloped but dune not completely natural because fences used
Little
Beach (next island to north) is only undeveloped barrier island in state
(Brigantine Refuge)
Long Beach Island
Sand
starvation of southern tip of island due to protection structures updrift
Rapid
erosion and inability of dunes to build up to establish cross-shore
environmental gradients
Reveals
problem of trying to establish undeveloped natural enclaves near developed
areas
Narrow
beach, dune and barrier in developed areas result in great vulnerability to
hazard
Storm
damage and rebuilding on this island were presented in previous lecture (3-part
photo)
Island Beach State Park
Undeveloped,
but not completely natural because fences used to repair breaches in dune
Dune
is linear and lacks topographic and vegetational diversity associated with
dynamism
Bay beach at Seaside
Short
fetch for wave generation across Barnegat Bay (lagoon)
Smaller
beach than beach in Delaware Bay because wave heights, periods and tidal range
smaller
Flooding
and erosion problems still occur because human structures too low and close to
bay shore
Lavallette
Example
of low, narrow, linear dune representing compromise between protection and view
Residents
reluctantly accepted dune as a condition of obtaining money for post storm
repairs
Here,
as at Avalon and Ocean City, evidence for eventual public support of
restoration
Headlands section of NJ coast
(Manasquan to Long Branch)
Streams
create inlets and interfere with transportation (many artificially closed)
Manasquan
Inlet
Net
transport of sand to north in northern NJ because of sheltering effect of Long
Island
Another
example of jetties creating accretion updrift and erosion downdrift
Private
ownership of beach prevents sand bypass
Groins
(now beach nourishment) used to mitigate downdrift erosion
Jetties
create more stable inlet and allow development closer to throat (natural
features lost)
Manasquan
example of landform disequilibrium and sand inundation caused by attempt to
maintain views
Northern spit zone
Sea
Bright/Monmouth Beach
Seawall
prevents inlet from forming and remaining
Example
of use of beach fill to protect a protection structure (value of fill
questioned)
Reveals
that seawall not end stage in development of an eroding developed coast
Sandy
Hook
Erosion
in south (accentuated by seawall); deposition in north
Sand
starvation in south resulted in need for beach fill; sediment then moves north
Beach
nourishment allowed by NPS because the spit is a recreation area, not a natl.
park
Raritan Bay
Eroding
upland; narrow beaches similar to Delaware Bay (similar tide, waves)
Natural
beaches truncated by structures; new nourished beaches and dunes overly large
Beaches
used because close to population centers; low energies favorable for children,
waders